answer this question

Robert Pattinson Question

Do you think Twilight would have been so popular if Robert Pattinson wasn't in it? The story is good but without him it wouldn't be the same!

 elmo_is_awesome posted over a year ago
next question »

Robert Pattinson Answers

xxxmermaidsxxx said:
Yeah, i think it would be the same...just whoever was playing Edward would have all the attention of the fangirls instead of Rob Pattinson. Whoever played Edward would be the one people have a huge crush on, its the character of him girls like which make everyone love him. thats what i think anyway...
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
yeah i kinda agree everyone wouldve just become obsessed with the pther actor who played edward.. buttt o do love rp... majorly
labi-has-ocd posted over a year ago
*
ya i agree
teamalice_0 posted over a year ago
*
thats your opinion. and i see where you're coming from, someone else would have portrayed edward differently to the way rob did and that bought about a certain character to it.
xxxmermaidsxxx posted over a year ago
Waca said:
I think it would be the same....we'll be ''in love''in another actor like we are in Rob..:))so,I think it would be the same....story is to Edward Cullen not to actor who plays him!:P
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
Blossom71 said:
yeah it would still have been good,but i'm sure glad robby got the part of edward because i just cann't picture it without him.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
marissa2014 said:
Honestly, i think twilight would be BETTER without Rob because he doesn't seem like a good Edward 2 me. I know they couldn't possibly pick an Edward that everybody that reads twilight would agree with but he just doesn't seem like the right guy to play the part. I don't even like the movies that much because they take to much stuff out. The books are AMAZING though. In my defense I am just way too in love with the Edward in my head i think its unhealthy.LOL
select as best answer
Honestly, i think twilight would be BETTER without Rob because he doesn't seem like a good Edward 2 me. I know they couldn't possibly pick an Edward that everybody that reads twilight would agree with but he just doesn't seem like the right guy to play the part. I don't even like the movies that much because they take to much stuff out. The books are AMAZING though. In my defense I am just way too in love with the Edward in my head i think its unhealthy.LOL
posted over a year ago 
flory said:
no lo se... Roberth es genial como actor pero antes de Twilight para mi su trabajo era irrelevante, asi que supongo q para el representa una gran oportunidad de crecer ... ha hecho un buen trabajo y si, quizas no hubiera sido lo mismo pero quizas hubiera sido mejor.. I LOVE ROB!
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
yellowstars said:
i think it would be the same.. i read twilight before there was going to be a movie and my friends and i were so excited when a film was announced so i think we would have been happy with it anyway.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
ditto
teamalice_0 posted over a year ago
*
:)
yellowstars posted over a year ago
*
i just heard that twilights been sued :S
yellowstars posted over a year ago
paramore_riot said:
Yes because Twilight was populer before the movie and even if Rob was not in it I think it would still be populer with someone else but not as populer it is now......
select as best answer
Yes because Twilight was populer before the movie and even if Rob was not in it I think it would still be populer with someone else but not as populer it is now......
posted over a year ago 
*
I think that Rob is so popular because of Twilight...not many people had heard of him before that
blondiexoxo posted over a year ago
*
ya like i knew him though Harry Potter but his fame has gone way up since then
paramore_riot posted over a year ago
KirstenEff said:
Robert pattison is the star in twilight i don't think twilight would have been the same without him so i can't wait for stephenie meyer to bring the twilght series from edwards side!
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
ilove-robthomas said:
i think it would be the same but not as good; people wouldnt be as obsessed as they are now; it would just be another crazy love movie. Rob brings something unique to the movie; like his personality. & it helps that he has stunningly good looks :)
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
mcclare34 said:
i think so, because in the beginning, most of the fans didn't even like rob!
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
tooch said:
I think it would have had the same popularity with or without Robert Pattinson.
Everyone, even me, fell in love with Edward Cullen, before we knew that he was going to be portrayed by Robert Pattinson, in the movie.
But I was honestly jumping around my house in excitement, when I heard Rob was going to be in the movie (:
But either way, and with or without Robert, I think it would still have had the same amount of popularity.
-xo.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
elizabethbennet said:
of course it would have been popular without robert!!i don't think he is the best actor in the film and i think that what made the film so popular is the beautiful enchanting story,not the actors...and if i have to admit kristen is much better like an actor than robert
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
daddysdiva said:
it probably would be populare......but not as populare as it is right now if robert wasnt in it
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
queengrace33 said:
It wouldnt have been as good without him I think he was born for this part.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
next question »